
The brief almost always arrives as a traffic number.
01 · The question as it arrives
“We need more leads.” Then, usually within a minute, the correction: not more leads. Better ones.
The pipeline is not empty. It is full of people who were never going to buy, and someone has to read every one of them. The team is busy and the results are thin, which is a harder problem to describe than an empty pipeline.
The proposal already on the table is more traffic. Traffic is the number everyone can see, it is the number the last agency reported on, and it is the one that moves inside a quarter.
02 · Why the obvious answer fails
Traffic multiplies what the site already does. It does not change it.
Take a site where 100 visitors a week produce three enquiries, and one of those three is worth a meeting. Four times the traffic produces twelve enquiries and four meetings — and eight more conversations for whoever answers the form. The ratio has not moved. The cost has.
That cost is rarely counted, because it does not appear on the media invoice. It lands on the person replying to enquiries, and it lands as a slower reply to the ones that mattered.
The second problem is that bought traffic is not the traffic you had. Paid channels reach people earlier in the decision than search does. The ratio usually gets worse under campaign pressure rather than holding steady, and the report still shows the traffic line going up.
There is a third problem underneath both. Most organisations running this argument do not share a definition of a lead. Marketing counts a form submission, sales counts a conversation worth having, and the two are reported in different meetings. A traffic campaign is then judged against whichever definition flatters it.
03 · What we look at instead
What the site asks for. A form asking for a name and an email address qualifies nobody. A form that asks what you are running now, and what you have already tried, does most of the sorting before a person reads it. It also costs you the enquiries that were never going to convert, which is the point.
Who the page is addressed to. Most B2B pages are written to the whole market. A reader who is a fit and a reader who is not read the same words, and both decide they are welcome. Naming the client you want — the size, the situation, the decision in front of them — filters on the way in.
What happens after the form. A qualified enquiry stays qualified for about as long as it takes to get an answer. If the first reply is a calendar link, the enquiry has been sorted by who is free on Thursday.
The objection to a longer form is that it reduces enquiries. It does, and that is the mechanism working. The test is which enquiries it removes. If the count drops and the number of meetings holds, the form is filtering. If both drop together it is obstructing, and the fix is the wording rather than the length.
04 · Where to start
Start with the enquiries you already have. Sort the last twenty into two groups: the ones that became good clients, and the ones that were never going to.
Trace each enquiry in the second group back to the page it came from and the question it answered. A pattern usually appears quickly.
If most of them arrived through the same page, that page is where the work begins. Sending it more traffic would only repeat the problem at a larger scale.
Alongside that, agree a single written definition of a lead with whoever owns the sales number. Until both teams count the same thing, the traffic debate cannot be settled.

